So I’ve seen some recent “news” about the ability to “crack” any Windows system using the Vista recovery cd. I ignored it a couple times, but then I saw a post about it on F-Secure’s blog. And I just have to sigh in exasperation. Surprise - if you have physical access to a machine, you can read the hard drive! I realize that Mr. Rousku is trying to point out that the Vista recovery CD makes this super easy…but honestly, there are other easy methods to do this. How about a Knoppix boot CD? Is that not easy? Is a GUI browser like Konquerer more difficult to use to navigate a hard drive than the DOS command prompt? How about physically removing the drive and putting it in an external USB enclosure. OK, sure, it requires the use of a screwdriver and an extra piece of hardward, but anybody that’s going to be able to navigate a disk using standard DOS commands will probably be able to manage the necessary mechanical skills necessary to remove a hard drive. I mean come on people, seriously. You’re making a big deal out of a “recovery tool”. Out of functionality that is required for recovery and can be achieved using any number of CD’s or previous Windows/MS-DOS boot disks that have been out there since I’ve been a toddler. Why is this such an issue?? Seriously, if Microsoft “fixed” this issue, I could simply download an MS-DOS boot disk and boot to a command prompt and have instant command line access as well. I’m repeating myself, so allow me to quickly rehash his assumptions:
...